Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts

Monday, October 20, 2008

Where's the outcry for alternative fuels now?


It seems obvious to me that there is no legitimate immediate demand for alternative fuel sources. The "inconvenient" pressure from eco-left had everyone in the country feeling guilty about our energy consumption. At least over the past year and a half. So much so, that certain presidential candidates didn't want us to drive SUV's anymore (huh!?!) Even our #1 cash crop was ravaged for the sake of ethanol. All for the making energy cheaper and of course more eco-friendly. Well, my question is...where are the demands now? Where is the political and social outcry?

It's seems funny, with the current national average for a gallon of gas hovering around $2.92 and not $3.92 like it was at the peak of the inquisition, we don't hear the vitriolic pro-wind, pro-bio fuel rhetoric quite as much. What has happened? Where are all the T. Boone Pickens commercials that inundated the airways not so long ago? Where is Al Gore telling us that we are melting the Polar Bear population into extinction? Has the need for alternative fuels and the salvation of our planet suddenly disappeared now that gas prices have sunk below $3? Or is it the same old scare tactic from the eco-left that has been seen as transparent once again?

We do need energy independence, however. We need to tap our own resources (oil and natural gas) while seeking other forms of viable future energy. But we need to accomplish this intelligently and comprehensively. We don't need the knee jerk reaction "end of the world" scenarios forced down our throats every time the price of gas goes up.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Give it a rest Obama!


Sunday's are the first day of the week to some and the last day of the week to others. However, no matter how you look at it, most American families spend their mornings going to church. It's not a pastime but a devoted and timeless standard. The remaining portion of the day, especially this time of year, is spent watching football surrounded by family, friends and/or fellow fanatics. You know, enjoying some serious down time from the strenuous week to simply relax, gorge yourself on junk food and get lost in the roller coaster of emotions the three hour contest evokes. This is America's pastime. This is how we, sports loving Americans, take our mind off the troubles in our life, the monotony of the 40+ hour week and the general ills of our society. It's a time for us to put our worries on "hold" and let our grid-iron passion overflow in ritualistic "fist pumping" diversion.

For me, what I enjoy about this time between 1-3 pm (actually 1- 11pm), is not just the game itself, but the entire package...even the commercials. At preselected times during the pigskin tug-of-war, we are bombarded with advertisements filled with the accoutrement so necessary for the enjoyment of the game. Food, drink, cars, male enhancement and gym membership usually make up the proprietary blend of what we're forced to tolerate. Rightfully so, considering the audience. However, this past Sunday we were the unfortunate victims of what seems to be a bad joke. There before my eyes, immediately proceeding my favorite truck commercial, I was sucker-punched by an Obama political ad. I know, can you believe the "audacity?" And this doosey wasn't your basic 30 second spot either, it went on for well over a minute. "What was this nonsense!" For a moment my secure, testosterone-filled world of football was turned on it's ear. "Who would let this happen...what kind of bafoon would do such a thing?...Why? Why I ask you!?!" After my brief moment of shock escalated into blinding rage, I reluctantly found the inner peace to calm myself to realize I was watching NBC, which conveniently answered my first question. Then I watched Obama try to appeal to me with his socialistic, "rob from the rich and give to the poor" version of healthcare and I quickly understood what kind of "non-fan" would pull such a stunt.

Look, I understand the election is less than a month away. I get it! I know these candidates are fighting for every last vote. But don't they have any morals? Is nothing sacred to them? If not for the sake of Sunday and a day of rest, then how about for the millions of football loving loyalists that don't want to be harrassed. Leave the political folly for primetime on the "main-stream media." Don't dare taint football Sunday with your disgraceful executive pandering. Trust me, the last thing we want to see is someone like Obama, especially Obama, take our time away from the nostalgic childlike diversion we expect to temporarily sustain us amid the woes of our society. And that goes for the brief and weightless commercials we've grown to expect, as well. Give me male enhancement! Give me SUV's! Give me fast-food! Just don't give me politics, at least not between the hours of 1 and 11pm on Sunday afternoons.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Dear Mr. Obama


Political Warfare: Is it me or is this ad a torpedo into ship Obama. The soldier, the words, the music. Tough ad to counter.

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Bush doctrine? Which one?

Governor Sarah Palin acquitted herself well the other night in her first real media interview since becoming McCain's VP pick. The Press and the Obama camp were salivating. This, they hoped, was the chance for the media to help bring down Palin. Well, Palin 1, Obama and the liberal media 0. Palin handled herself well. She was decisive and unafraid of the, at times, condescending Charlie Gibson of ABC.

There was one glimmer of hope for Obama and the Media. Gibson asked Palin if she agreed with the "Bush Doctrine." Palin replied: "In what respect." The one-uppers immediately jumped. "She doesn't know what the Bush doctrine is!....how pathetic." Of course today one in their own camp helped destroy this one little hope. Talking to at least 5 people myself I got 5 different answers. There is no officially written Bush doctrine to read about. And there are at least 7 possible Bush doctrines according to experts. Charlie Gibson should have done his homework. So Palin was right to ask for clarification. Maybe it should actually be Palin 2, Obama and the liberal media 0.

Here's a clip from the interview.